Blog

Subscribe to RSS

Get our blog feed via e-mail

Posts Tagged ‘Democrats’

Vote For Union Members’ Best Interests!

By Fred Scales
USW LOCAL 1013, Birmingham, Ala.

I sit up many of nights during these election years wondering how many of our USW brothers and sisters vote for candidates who are openly anti-labor.

Are they so blinded by distrust of people who may not look like themselves or who come from a different side of the tracks that they would rather vote against their own self interest?

As a union brother I will never vote for a party or candidate on any elected level who is openly anti-labor. There was a time when these candidates hid in the shadows and only revealed themselves when it was too late to react. However, today they are open about their anti-labor stances and can still win the votes of certain USW members.

IT HAS TO STOP NOW!!

***

To submit a blog to Free Speech Zone, e-mail it to bstack@usw.org. Keep it to 250 words or fewer. You MUST include your full name, hometown, and state. You may attach a photograph of yourself. Please include a phone number. This WILL NOT be published. Posting any given blog is within the discretion of the USW.  No blog using foul language (this is a family site), false information (we don’t want to get sued), or unnecessary personal attacks (again, we don’t want to get sued) will be used. Wait a reasonable period of time, then blog again! This is a Free Speech Zone.

A Holiday Message

Jared Bernstein
Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

We may be at an interesting inflection point.

- Large majorities have had it with Congressional dysfunctionality.

- Influential Republicans like Mitch McConnell are recognizing the above and view it as a threat to their party.

- Reasonable conservative voices are writing smart pieces that seem to be reaching for hybrid positions on social and economic issues. See here and here, for example.

- The latest debacle — the fight to extend unemployment insurance and the payroll tax cut — appears to have demonstrably hurt the Republicans and helped the Democrats (especially the president), and one might expect that ensuing fights will redound similarly, i.e., the public appears to be internalizing the meme that the Democrats are fighting for the middle class while the Republicans are fighting for the rich. Politically, this is a dangerous possibility for Republicans, especially in an election year.

Don’t get me wrong — I’m not suggesting a Kumbaya moment is in the offing. There are still irresistible forces in play here; the Tea Party members of Congress are, I suspect, if anything, even more pissed off and ready to wreck more havoc when they get back. A wounded tiger is a dangerous tiger. (more…)

Why We May Be In Store for a Passionless Presidential Race

By Robert Reich
Former U.S. Secretary of Labor, Professor at Berkeley

Polls show Americans angrier and more polarized than at any time since the Vietnam War. That’s not surprising. We have the worst economy since the Great Recession and the worst politics in living memory. The rise of the regressive right over the last three decades has finally spurred a progressive reaction. Occupiers and others have had enough.

Yet paradoxically the presidential race that officially begins a few months from now is likely to be as passionless as they come.

President Obama will be supported by progressives and the Democratic base, but without enthusiasm. His notorious caves to Republicans and Wall Street — failing to put conditions on the Street’s bailout (such as demanding the Street help stranded home owners), or to resurrect Glass-Steagall, or include a public option in health care, or assert his constitutional responsibility to raise the debt limit, or protect Medicare and Social Security, or push for cap-and-trade, or close Guantanamo, or, in general, confront the regressive Republican nay-sayers and do-nothings with toughness rather than begin negotiations by giving them much of what they want — are not the stuff that stirs a passionate following. (more…)

Did FDR Call It Or What?

FDR’s premonitions about the ways Republicans would treat Social Security, saving homes, and work for the unemployed are stunning and scary. Take a look:

Dear America (non-Weiner version)

(more…)

Deficit Reduction Requires Shared Sacrifice: Will the President Stand Tall?

Sen. Bernie Sanders

By Bernie Sanders
Independent U.S. Senator from Vermont

Congress and the White House are now focused on how we deal with our huge deficit — a crisis brought about over the last 10 years by two wars, tax breaks for the rich, the Wall Street bailout and a prescription drug program — all unpaid for. The deficit also increased as a result of the declining tax revenues during a current recession, caused by the greed and illegal behavior of Wall Street.

The debate over deficit reduction comes at an unusual moment in American economic history. While the middle class is in rapid decline and poverty is increasing, the wealthiest people in our country and largest corporations are doing phenomenally well. Over the last several decades almost all new income created in this country has gone to the top 1 percent, who now earn more income than the bottom 50 percent. Further, the United States now has the most unequal distribution of wealth of any major country with the top 400 individuals owning more wealth than the bottom 150 million. (more…)

Democrats’ Polite, Insidious ‘Pro-Union’ Arm Twisting

Roger Bybee

By Roger Bybee
Milwaukee Freelance Writer

Next to Republican governors like Ohio’s John Kasich and Wisconsin’s Scott Walker, it would be very easy for Democrats to look more sympathetic to union rights, the needs of working people and the ever-shrinking middle class.

The Democrats lost 63 House seats and six Senate seats in the 2010 mid-terms in the industrial midwest as key Democratic constituencies stayed home. Now would seem to be a great opportunity for the Democrats to rebuild their relationship with unions and their supporters in the insecure middle class.

The party could seize this opening by promoting an agenda stressing the creation of public jobs via desperately-needed infrastructure re-building and that the privileged top 2 percent of corporations ought to bear a fair share of the tax burden needed to maintain services and balance state budgets. The agenda’s premise: The primary victims of the recession should not suffer more due to cuts in services they desperately need (e.g., education, healthcare). (more…)

An Unconscionable Silence

Rick Sloan

By Rick Sloan
Communications Director, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

Where are labor’s allies? Where are Israel’s friends? Where, exactly, are the supporters of civil rights, immigrant rights and women’s rights?

Each core Democratic constituency is under attack. Many of the attacks are vicious and unrelenting. Some are presented as nuanced disagreements, but are no less traumatic in the long run. Still others face the silent and deadly assaults of indifference and inertia.

And yet, each attack is mostly met with silence by those not directly under attack.

When collective bargaining — the raison d’etre of the American labor movement — is being erased for public employees, the impact on their members’ lives is immediate: reduced salaries and benefits, lay-offs and furloughs. The longer term implications are even worse: a declining standard of living, a diminished respect for their talents, and a weakening of labor’s political power. So, to me, the silence of labor’s allies is beyond troubling. It is unconscionable.

When Israel’s security — its defense both militarily and diplomatically — is diminished ever so slightly, the Diaspora reacts instantaneously, and justifiably so. In the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War, Jews everywhere learned how vulnerable Israel was and how precarious were the peacetime promises of support. However, after these two Wars, two Intifadas, incessant rocket attacks and suicide bombings, Palestinian population growth and extreme regional instability, the risks that individual Israelis face daily are somehow taken for granted. So, too, is the existence of the State of Israel. Neither should be. Not now, not ever. And when they are met with silence from Israel’s alleged friends, it is more than ominous, it’s unconscionable.

Last month the “official” unemployment rate among African-Americans stood at 15.9 percent and the “official” jobless rate among young Black teenagers was 38.3 percent. The “official” unemployment rate among Latinos was 11.2 percent. Black women and Latinas had “official” jobless rates of 12.8 percent and 11.4 percent, respectively. And yet, virtually no one in government said a word, even though real unemployment among Blacks and Latinos is easily twice as great as these dismal “official” rates. That, to me, is also unconscionable.

Why are the sounds of silence so pervasive?

Are we simply afraid? Are we afraid to criticize Congressional Democrats for fear that Fox News will loop our comments? Are we afraid to challenge the first African-American president of the United States when his policies ignore harsh realities? Are we afraid to tell our allies, friends and supporters an uncomfortable truth just to keep peace in the family?

Perhaps I lack the standing to say this. For I do not belong to a public employee union; I am not a Jew; I am not Black, Latino, female or young; and I am not jobless. But this unconscionable silence is doing all of us a grave disservice.

This silence encourages our foes, gives comfort to our enemies and guarantees that, sooner or later, our opponents will prevail. And when they do, you — and I — will rue the day when we muzzled our own voices… and also allowed others to remain mute.

Pastor Martin Niemoller, fondly remembered for his “then they came for me” quote, came to recognize the collective responsibility of German civil society for the Nazi atrocities. In a speech to the Confessing Church in Frankfort on January 6, 1947, he said:

We preferred to keep silent. We certainly are not without guilt/fault, and I ask myself again and again, what would have happened, if in the year 1933 or 1934… 14,000 Protestant pastors and all Protestant communities had defended the truth until their deaths?

We are not in an analogous era. The attacks we face are mere pinpricks compared to the millions of deaths in Germany and across the globe between 1933 and that 1947 speech. But Pastor Niemoller’s observation — we preferred to keep silent — and his nagging question — what would have happened, if — are powerful reminders that silence in the face of injustice is not golden.

I, for one, prefer to speak up. I urge you to do likewise. And I plead with our allies, friends and supporters to speak out with clarity and conviction.

For every voice raised against an injustice adds more than decibels to the debate. Every additional voice adds diversity, legitimacy and vibrancy and inspires others to act.

***

Rick Sloan is Communications Director of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers and Executive Director of UCubed. Follow Rick Sloan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RickSloan

***

This article appeared originally at Huffington Post.

Obama Returns to His Moral Vision: Democrats Read Carefully!

George Lakoff

By George Lakoff
Author, “The Political Mind,” “Moral Politics,” “Don’t Think of an Elephant!

Last week, on April 13, 2011, President Obama gave all Democrats and all progressives a remarkable gift. Most of them barely noticed. They looked at the president’s speech as if it were only about budgetary details. But the speech went well beyond the budget. It went to the heart of progressive thought and the nature of American democracy, and it gave all progressives a model of how to think and talk about every issue.

It was a landmark speech. It should be watched and read carefully and repeatedly by every progressive who cares about our country — whether Democratic office-holder, staffer, writer, or campaign worker — and every progressive blogger, activist and concerned citizen. The speech is a work of art.

The policy topic happened to be the budget, but he called it “The Country We Believe In” for a reason. The real topic was how the progressive moral system defines the democratic ideals America was founded on, and how those ideals apply to specific issues. Obama’s moral vision, which he applied to the budget, is more general: it applies to every issue. And it can be applied everywhere by everyone who shares that moral vision of American democracy.

Discussion in the media has centered on economics — on the president’s budget policy compared with the Republican budget put forth by Paul Ryan. But, as Robert Reich immediately pointed out, “Ten or twelve-year budgets are baloney. It’s hard enough to forecast budgets a year or two into the future.” The real economic issues are economic recovery and the distribution of wealth. As I have observed, the Republican focus on the deficit is really a strategy for weakening government and turning the country conservative in every respect. The real issue is existential: what is America at heart and what is America to be. (more…)

Why the Democrats Should Never Have Started Paying Ransom to Avoid a Shutdown

Robert Reich

By Robert Reich
Former U.S. Secretary of Labor, Professor at Berkeley

It’s called ransom. That’s what Republicans are demanding from the White House and congressional Democrats for not pulling the plug on the government.

Problem is, when you pay ransom once, you’re almost begging to pay it again. And that’s exactly the pickle the Obama administration is finding itself in.

In order to avoid a shutdown last week and buy time until March 18, the White House agreed to more spending cuts for the remainder of this fiscal year than it originally put on the table. Now, in order to get past March 18, Republicans want even more. Democrats have offered to cut an additional $10.5 billion but Republicans want $61 billion. The White House is hinting it’s ready to compromise further.

Of course it is. Both sides want to look as if they’re willing to compromise because neither side wants to be blamed by the public if a shutdown happens. (more…)