Blog

Where Will the Jobs Come From?

Robert Borosage

Robert Borosage

Robert L. Borosage
Co-Director
Campaign for America’s Future

They are popping the bubbly on Wall Street. Million dollar bonuses; the Dow at 10,000; the casino is open again. Forget President Obama who says we can’t go back to an economy where finance pockets 40% of the profits. We’re already headed there.

The current account deficit is down as Americans have cut back spending. But the deficit with China is hitting new records; companies are still shipping manufacturing jobs over there. The dollar is down, but not against the Chinese currency. Forget about Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke who warns against going back to the unsustainable trade imbalances that led us over the cliff. The old patterns are coming back.

Bernanke has announced that the recession is over, the recovery has begun. But to date, we are looking at a reversion, not a recovery. We’ve stopped the free fall, but we haven’t changed direction. There can be no recovery to the old economy that crashed when the housing bubble burst. That economy depended on Americans spending more than they earned, borrowing ever greater amounts, treating their homes like at ATM machine, while the Chinese lent us the money to keep interest rates down so we could buy the goods our companies made with the jobs they shipped over there.

Now that old economy didn’t work very well when it was growing. We lost high wage manufacturing jobs during the supposed “recovery” under Bush. Most Americans lost ground even while the economy was expanding. Household debts reached new highs. Inequality soared to Gilded Age extremes.

But now we can’t even get back to that performance. Americans have lost some $13 trillion in assets. They are tightening belts, trying to pay down debts, terrified as jobs are lost, hours cut, benefits slashed. Consumers won’t drive the US economy, much less the world’s. And businesses aren’t investing because consumers are cutting back. They are increasing profits by laying off workers and cutting back expenses. States and localities are headed into severe layoffs of teachers and police. The economy isn’t going to be buoyed by soaring exports to a world in recession. The only thing holding the economy up now is the deficit financed stimulus plan and the automatic stabilizers like food stamps and unemployment benefits.

Where will the jobs come from? Wall Street can produce another bubble, but that won’t put the 15 million without jobs to work, one third of which have been out of work for at least six months.

Recovery requires fundamental reform of America’s economic strategy. The old shibboleths of the conservative era – small government, cut top end taxes, free multinationals to move jobs abroad, deregulate finance, war on labor unions, trade deficits don’t matter – have failed ignominiously. They must be discarded, like yesterday’s rotted fruit.

Fundamental changes are needed. Trickle down should be supplanted by public investment led growth – large scale public investments in areas vital to our future like infrastructure, research and development, education and training. These investments should be deficit funded until the economy actually starts putting people back to work, and then sustained and paid for through progressive tax reform. Tax speculative security transactions, generating $100 billion a year in revenue to invest in a 21st century infrastructure that would put people to work and make the economy more productive. Raise top end taxes, reduce inequality, and invest in making college affordable or exploring the green technologies of the future.

We’ve pursued tax cuts, promising private investments would flourish. But much of the productive investment and lavish consumption went abroad. In reality, public investment would be far more effective. We have a staggering public investment deficit that must be met for a world efficient economy. Public investment is more likely to be invested, more likely to be spent here, more likely to create good jobs here, and far more likely to generate new technologies and productive private investments.

We need to complement this with a bold manufacturing strategy to make certain that we help lead the inevitable green industrial revolution, so the new technologies will be created and made in America. Shed the notion that we’ll benefit by importing windmills and solar cells and electric cars subsidized by China so that they are cheaper to us. We can’t exchange dependence on foreign oil with dependence on foreign made windmills. Make the public commitment to transition, and then use our purchasing power to invite the companies with the best technology to bid on contracts so long as they make it here in America. Not simply a timid buy America policy satisfied with the final assembly of parts and technologies made elsewhere, but moving entire supply chains so that our workers and engineers and entrepreneurs are familiar with cutting edge technologies that our inventors can soon surpass.

Complement this with a new global trade strategy. We can’t go back to current account deficits over 6% of GDP, financed by borrowing from abroad. China, now some ¾ of our manufactured goods deficit, is by far the hub of the problem. The President has wisely called on the international community to adjust cooperatively, challenging the Chinese and other mercantilist nations to expand domestic demand and reduce their reliance on exports, while the US exports more and buys less. But that isn’t going to happen so long as the Chinese are free to manipulate their currency, subsidize their exports, savage their workers and environment, and mandate global corporations transfer jobs and technology to them. So we’ll need to show some bite. A bold manufacturing policy around new energy will encourage companies, including Chinese companies, to make things here. But we should be debating putting a lid on our deficits, and announcing that we will move slowly to balance our trade. If all adjust, we can have more trade, not less, but we can’t go back to the old imbalances no matter what they do.

These must be complemented by financial reform that curbs the gambling and forces banks to make loans to Main Street again, and by a high wage policy – empowering workers, lifting the minimum wage, extending the public social contract. Finally, our economic policy – both monetary and fiscal – must be targeted at sustaining full employment as a priority, without letting inflation get completely out of control.

These ideas – heresies in the old conservative times – are but the beginning towards defining a new course. They will face fierce resistance from entrenched interests. But perhaps the biggest obstacle is the encrusted hold of old, bad ideas that should already have been discarded. You can see that in the calls for balancing the budget and cutting spending while unemployment is reaching new heights. Or the Republican chorus about cutting taxes, as if they had learned nothing. Or conservative Democrats railing against limited buy American policies. Or the administration proclaiming its opposition to industrial policy. Or conservatives railing against excessive regulation.

Inertia and interest drive us to revert, not reform. Only it won’t work. The old standards don’t play anymore. Sure, Wall Street can generate another bubble or two. But there is no recovery on that old path – only stagnation, crushing long term unemployment, growing inequality, a devastated middle class and a social tinderbox increasingly ready to explode. Eventually, we’ll have to change our course – the only question is how much pain we have to endure before we actually learn our lessons.

4 Responses to “Where Will the Jobs Come From?”

  1. gspencer Says:

    The new jobs will be overseas and paying only a tiny fraction of the wages that US citizens have previously enjoyed.

    The US Businesses must relocate manufacturing plants out of this country and/or outsource labor expenditures to lower paying countries as much as possible if they want to satisfy the US consumer’s demand for the lowest price possible for the US consumer’s purchases or become bankrupt by paying decent wages to US citizens. If some business does not outsource their labor costs overseas, then their competitors will. The average US consumer will always buy a foreign made product rather than for a more expensive American made product if he has a choice.

    There is very little economic incentive for US citizen college students to major in any of the science or engineering fields at this time. I believe that most students today want to study business and/or economics in order to become one of the wealthy Wall Street (master criminal) business tycoons. No person in his or her right mind would major in science or engineering since the pay scale has eroded so much in the last few decades and the study is so demanding compared to several other less demanding and more economically rewarding fields of study.

    Asian countries are now outdistancing the USA by producing very large numbers of competent scientists and engineers that might be even more creative and more competent than the US educated scientists and engineers.

    According to the National Science Foundation and the National Society of Professional Engineers, only about 5% of the current college students in the USA studying for a degree in science, medicine, mathematics or engineering are US citizens. In the Asia the vast majority of the college students are majoring in science or engineering. We need to increase the percentage of USA citizen college students studying science and engineering from 5% to at least 80%, in order to emulate the economic industrial successes of the Asian countries.

    Only US import tariffs high enough to prohibit imported products from being imported and sold in the USA will create re-industrialization, stop the flow of title to privately owned US assets from the USA, re-create the value of the US dollar, and also create manufacturing jobs for US citizens.

    Yes the consumers will have to pay many times the current price of each item if these items if they are are made in the USA, but maybe this can avert a second American revolution.

  2. gspencer Says:

    Riots and insurrections are predictable, ala the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution, when the people find their situations economically hopeless. Mass unemployment will foster mass civil unrest, crime, anger, riots, revolution, starvation, etc. The Great Depression unemployment rates were reported to be 25 or 30% and there was no revolution. As we increase our number of unemployed citizens each month and completely destroy our remaining jobs and any hope of any future employment, we will reach a point where the unemployed masses will want a change of government.

  3. gspencer Says:

    Maybe the US government can borrow some US dollars from the industrialized nations and then hire US citizens to dig some holes, and then re-fill the same holes, or maybe rake leaves, or play music in the park, or write poems, or perform in a play, or take a picture of a Crucifix, or pave roads, or teach school; or plant trees, or clean up the environment, or paint pictures, or invent new financial products, or bailout failed financial businesses, etc.

    These jobs will not be useful or contribute anything to correcting the basic USA economic foundation problems which are the foreign trade deficit and the Federal Government Spending deficit. We most stop borrowing US dollars (back from foreign industrialized nations) to pay for government expenses.

  4. gspencer Says:

    I believe that the US government should borrow back some of the US dollars from the same foreigners that US citizens paid with US Dollars to make the things that US citizens consumed, and then throw these US dollars at these same incompetent wall street financial master geniuses that created this employment disaster? That should stimulate the economy! Are you telling me that this is what the US government has been doing for the last several months? Why is this not working? Why are US industries accelerating their factory closings and speeding up the discharging their remaining US employees as they move the remaining US jobs overseas.

    As soon as everybody is unemployed, the new applicants for unemployment benefits each month will reduce to acceptable levels, and then maybe the government labor department statisticians will proclaim success.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.