Blog

Subscribe to RSS

Get our blog feed via e-mail

President's Perspective, By Leo W. Gerard, USW International 	President

Finally, a President with the Guts to Enforce Trade Laws

 

Leo W. Gerard

Leo W. Gerard

By Leo W. Gerard
International President

Barack Obama proved Friday he’s got grit. He enforced trade laws.

These are special trade safeguard rules, called “Section 421,”  that the Chinese had agreed to obey to gain entrance to the World Trade Organization (WTO). They are, however, laws that had gone unenforced by the U.S. in the past.

President Obama used these safeguard rules to imposed tariffs on tires manufactured in China and imported into the U.S., following a recommendation by the International Trade Commission, an independent, bi-partisan group. The action made Obama the first president to execute sanctions under “Section 421.”

The International Trade Commission recommended sanctions under “Section 421” four times before Obama took office. Nothing was done. The result was closed American factories, lost American manufacturing jobs, diminished American dreams.

Not this time though. Not this president. Obama showed he’s made of tougher stuff. By placing tariffs on imported Chinese tires, President Obama put himself in the line of fire for the jobs of U.S. workers, for the preservation of U.S. manufacturing and, ultimately, for the stabilization of the U.S. economy.

Don’t kid yourself. This is a battle. For the U.S. to maintain a viable economy, it must sustain a strong manufacturing base. It must make products of value that can be sold here and overseas – not just swap paper, some of it bogus on Wall Street.

The U.S. economy is under attack by countries engaging in unfair trade. In the past decade, we’ve lost 40,000 manufacturing facilities. In just the 21 months since the Great Recession began, more than 2 million manufacturing workers have lost their jobs, making their unemployment rate 11.8 percent, significantly higher than the 9.7 percent rate for the average worker.

That’s what the Chinese tire case was all about. My union, the United Steelworkers (USW) filed it in April. We demanded penalties against China because it has smothered the U.S. market with tires. In 2004, its share of the U.S market was 4.7 percent. Four years later, it was 16.7 percent. In that time, the number of tires it sold rose from 14.6 million to 46 million. As a result, four U.S. tire manufacturing plants closed and 5,100 workers lost their jobs. Another three plants will close before year’s end, throwing 3,000 more U.S. workers on the street.

We filed for relief under “Section 421” for two reasons. One is that it provides quicker relief than other trade remedies. The other is that China consented to its provisions. When China wanted to get into the World Trade Organization in 2000, it secured U.S. support by agreeing to abide by Section 421 until 2013. Section 421 was designed to protect the U.S. economy by providing ways to combat unfair and damaging surges of particular Chinese imports.

In the past, corporations had asked for Section 421 tariffs. And we had joined them. This time, not one tire company joined us, though, to be clear, Goodyear was openly neutral. By contrast, Ohio-based Cooper, fought us. As did a collection of rag-tag import firms, one of which had nearly gone bankrupt after importing defective Chinese tires that had to be recalled after a series of crashes.

 Cooper, in testimony to the International Trade Commission, reported that all of the tires it makes at its Chinese plant, under its licensing agreement with the Chinese, must be exported until May, 2012. So it has a clear financial interest in preventing tariffs on imported tires to the U.S. The tire import companies have the same interest. For them, it’s about the money they make today, no matter how or where it’s made. They’ve got no allegiance to the U.S. and don’t care what happens to America’s future manufacturing capability or financial stability.

President Obama, by contrast, is a patriot who sees the big picture and takes the long view. U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio was right when he said after the tire tariffs were announced:

“Today the President courageously stood up and enforced fair trade rules that will save jobs and help our communities. Since China joined the World Trade Organization, American workers have not been assured that the government would defend them against unfair trade. With this “Section 421” decision, President Obama has taken the side of American workers and manufacturers.

“Rigorous trade enforcement is a major piece of our manufacturing and global competitiveness strategy. If American workers and manufacturers are going to compete in the global market, they need to have a government that uses trade enforcement tools, including the Section 421 safeguard.”

American workers and American manufacturers can compete – when trade is fair. It’s unfair when countries don’t enforce their own labor regulations, including their own minimum wage laws. It’s unfair when U.S. companies abide by strict environmental regulations and those in other countries openly pollute air and water. It’s unfair when other countries allow their firms to steal trade secrets, when other countries demand that firms export all of their products for a certain number of years and when other countries manipulate the value of their currencies.

If trade laws aren’t enforced, America will lose virtually all manufacturing and become nothing but a dumping ground – a place where the rest of the world sells the stuff it makes. Fewer and fewer citizens in that America would be able to buy stuff after the factories close and all the jobs that they support disappear.

In announcing the tire trade sanctions — tariffs of 35 percent for a year beginning Sept. 26, 30 percent for a year after that, and 25 percent in the final year — U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said, “Enforcing trade laws is key to maintaining an open and free trading system.”

Unfair trade isn’t free.

President Obama is bold enough to draw that line of distinction for America.

10 Responses to “Finally, a President with the Guts to Enforce Trade Laws”

  1. gspencer Says:

    Dear President Gerard:

    This is a good first step!

    Hooray for Obama!

    How about refrigerators, washing machines, clothing, TV’s, electronics, tires, auto parts, machine tools, hand tools, power tools, appliances, and etc.

    How about passing laws to prohibit the export of service jobs such as accounting, telemarketing, customer service, computer aided drafting, engineering, etc. that are now provided by workers overseas through the internet.

    Please look into all of the jobs that have been exported from the USA to foreign nations over the last 20 years.

  2. Manufacture This » Blog Archive » A President who enforces trade laws Says:

    [...] International President Leo Gerard sums up President Obama’s decision on Friday to impose a safeguard remedy on surging Chinese tire imports this way: Barack Obama proved [...]

  3. Cheryl DeCero Says:

    Yes, FINALLY!!!! A President with enough guts to enforce existing trade laws. How refreshing when you consider the ITC had recommended sanctions under “Section 421″ not once, but actually FOUR times during a previous administration only to have their recommendations fall on selectively deaf ears. All the while Rome was burning in towns like Tyler, Texas, and elsewhere as tire manufacturing exited the U.S. to set-up shop overseas. Thousands of jobs were lost, leaving working families in limbo and their communities in crisis. This do-nothing approach ended last Friday when Barack Obama became the first president to execute sanctions under “Section 421.” President Obama sent a strong, powerful message to the American workforce as well as our trading partners abroad by decisively taking prompt, direct action to bring relief to what remains of tire manufacturing in the U.S. Thank you Mr. President and also to Mr. Leo Gerard of the United Steelworkers for bringing this case forward. Special thanks to Congressman Pete Visclosky, and to all members of the Congressional Steel Caucus, of which he chairs. Through solidarity we’ve just taken another step forward towards rebuilding our U.S. manufacturing base.

  4. beach Says:

    We need good representation, not leadership using scare tactics on it’s members.

  5. beach Says:

    The USW turned it’s back on new members in certain job categories.

  6. Glen Says:

    Here is an opportunity for the USW to call out the bullshit on “Free Trade” with mercantilist.

    Lets cut the crap. First off the the notion that American manufacturing is dying is patently false. It is not dying, unilateral free trade is killing it. Look at China’s response the the tire tariff. China is worried about the potential loss of 100,000 jobs because of this decision. The USW in its complaint mentioned that the US has already suffered the loss of 5,100 jobs with another 3,000 slated to be lost. So 8,100 American workers can equal the production capacity of 100,000 Chinese.

    China’s competitive advantage, is not just ‘cheap labor’. Look at the production of fasteners, A commodity (wire) goes in one end of a machine and a finished product comes out the other. If one is to except the myth that we are engaged in ‘Free Trade; then how come Chinese fasteners (nails and screws) can be priced 40% less than those made in the US, Europe or Canada? What gives, what can explain such a large discrepancy in prices?

    The answer lies is that China has engaged many different ways in which to ensure an advantage. Peter Navarro has detailed this in his “China Price Report”. Though it needs updating to account for other practises like export controls (see Coking coal and rare earth minerals).

    http://www.peternavarro.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/chinapricereport.pdf

    By the same token that American Manufacturing cannot compete with China, neither can American doctors, lawyers, dentist, professors, engineers, etc. The only difference is that most of them are protected from competition.

  7. Eric Lotke: The G-20 Summit: Lessons from Pittsburgh | TipTe.com Says:

    [...] decision to apply tariffs to remedy the “market disruption” of tires from China is a first step in this new [...]

  8. Eric Lotke: The G-20 Summit: Lessons from Pittsburgh | Obama Biden White House Says:

    [...] decision to apply tariffs to remedy the “market disruption” of tires from China is a first step in this new [...]

  9. Eric Lotke: The G-20 Summit: Lessons from Pittsburgh | The Latest Liberal Blogs Says:

    [...] decision to apply tariffs to remedy the “market disruption” of tires from China is a first step in this new [...]

  10. The G-20: Lessons from Pittsburgh - Eric Lotke Says:

    [...] Obama’s decision to apply tariffs to remedy the “market disruption” of tires from China is a first step in this new [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.