By Robert Kuttner
Co-Founder and Co-Editor of The American Prospect
Question for the day: Where is the economic recovery going to come from?
We are still at the stage of the recession where economic downdrafts are producing more downdrafts. Reduced purchasing power leads to fewer retail and factory sales and more layoffs, further reducing consumer demand. The Obama stimulus package, about 2.5 percent of GDP for each of two years, doesn’t make up enough of the difference. But the federal deficit, caused mainly by falling revenues and not by increased public spending, is alarming the budget hawks. The administration worries, correctly, that deficits will be high for several years to come and wonders who will keep lending Uncle Sam the money. Yet cutting back spending before recovery comes would be suicidal.
In addition, the financial sector has not yet returned to health, despite outsized profits (and bonuses) reported by the likes of Goldman Sachs. This is the kind of purely financial engineering that caused the collapse. The fevered activity at Goldman is a sign of lingering economic illness, not economic health. The rest of the economy, which depends on the financial sector for real investment capital, is still deeply depressed.
Louis Uchitelle’s piece in Sunday’s New York Times provides some instructive numbers.
Every major sector that reflects the purely private economy has been losing jobs, the only exception being energy extraction plus a tiny increase in computer systems design and management consulting. All of the other expanding sectors that are actually adding jobs reflect government spending – education, health, general government. But the declines in the workhorse parts of the private economy such as manufacturing, construction, and retailing are huge.
With purchasing power still declining and unemployment still rising, where will the recovery come from? White House economic chief Lawrence Summers, in a major speech at the Peterson Institute July 17, emphasized the good news.
“We were at the brink of catastrophe at the beginning of the year but we have walked some substantial distance back from the abyss,” he said. And, ever the empiricist, Summers reported that a Google search revealed that “hits for economic depression have returned to baseline levels.” That’s nice, but what Summers did not forecast was a robust recovery.
And if we stay on the present path, recovery will not come for a long time. Federal deficits will be large enough to raise questions about who will keep lending us the money – but not large enough to power a real recovery that increases real incomes and provides good jobs. The last time we had a massive financial meltdown like this, it took the hyper-stimulus of a war – World War II – to recapitalize industry and re-employ workers.
What, then, is the moral equivalent of war for the 21st century? Let’s think way, way outside the box.
We might begin with a serious strategy for rebuilding American manufacturing. American corporations and politicians have been cavalier about just letting manufacturing go. Uniquely among advanced and developing nations, we have no national strategy for nurturing manufacturing at home. There’s even an office in the Commerce Department that helps companies outsource.
As a result, even a modest uptick in purchasing power will not produce enough American jobs because there are so many things that America no longer makes.
We could start with clean energy, and move on to mass transit, and reclaim America’s capacity to make things. Right now, even if we massively shifted to wind and solar energy, other nations would get most of the production jobs because most solar panels and wind turbines are not made here, while Americans would just get the temporary installation jobs.
We could also get serious about insisting that other trading nations not coerce or bribe our manufactures to locate facilities overseas as a condition of doing business – a flagrant violation of trade law. We could start having a real industrial policy for commercial industry in the way that we have long had a tacit industrial policy for products deemed essential to the military.
The administration is confused about how to reconcile industrial goals with trade law. It had to do a lot of backing and filling so that tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to modernize the auto industry didn’t end up subsidizing more outsourcing of jobs to China. If trade law interferes with our ability to revive American manufacturing, then there’s something wrong with trade law and let’s change it.
For a fine summary on how to revive domestic manufacturing, take a look at the new book, Manufacturing a Better Future for America, edited by Richard McCormack and written by some of America’s best experts on reviving manufacturing.
The book is published by the Alliance for American Manufacturing.
After manufacturing, we need to get serious about investing in a new generation of public infrastructure – everything from smart-grid electrical systems to broadband and modern water and sewer and transportation systems. That will produce lots of good jobs, and make for a more efficient and productive economy.
As far as the deficit is concerned, it will probably need to get bigger before it gets smaller. During World War II, when the nation was a lot poorer and nearly half of our national output went to defeat the Axis powers, my parents and grandparents and tens of millions of Americans like them bought war bonds.
We didn’t depend on foreign borrowing, even though the deficits were far larger. Today, the government should create Recovery Bonds and market them to Americans, so that we can finance our own social investment and cease to be financial wards of foreign dictatorships.
The good people at Goldman Sachs can demonstrate their patriotism – not by offering to make money as financial middlemen – but by buying the first issue of these bonds as an investment. The government needs no investment bankers to market these bonds. It can sell them directly to citizens
Gentle reader, we are in a national economic emergency. This is not just about talking up the economy by emphasizing good news. The administration needs to stop smoking its own green shoots and offer strategies equal to the magnitude of the crisis.
***
Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect, and a Senior Fellow at Demos. His latest book is Obama’s Challenge.






July 20th, 2009 at 11:36 am
[...] played their part in harming our economy. But as Robert Kuttner says they’re not the only ones. In addition, the financial sector has not yet returned to [...]
July 21st, 2009 at 10:27 am
Real wealth and real monetary value is created only when a country (or an individual family) sells something to parties outside of that country (or family) in return for a net transfer of gold or currency from other countries to that country (or family). The citizens of that country reflect their real wealth with the accumulation of grain, gold, cattle, jewels, and/or other marketable products and commodities for reserve use in times of emergency and/or also to raise the standard of living for the citizens of that country.
The people in the country that grew and harvested something from the earth, that extracted something of commercial value from the earth, that provided services (medical, dental, engineering, technology, etc.), and/or that made (manufactured or constructed) something that is consumable (or useful) that was sold in exchange for foreign currency (or other commodities to other parties outside of that country) created wealth for that country from the currency received from the sales of those services and products and this increased the real wealth of that country (or family).
The USA has almost entirely ceased to generate wealth for future US generations. The USA has elected to sell or export title to US real estate, farms, agri-businesses, food supplies, dairies, forests, industries, breweries, hotels, factories, casinos, financial institutions, retail businesses, and most other assets located in the USA in order to raise money to pay people in foreign countries to manufacture the things that US citizens consume without US citizens working, and also to pay US government expenses.
My children and my unborn grandchildren can work hard and buy back these assets, while I sit idle and not have to work in some dirty factory making things that US citizens consume. We can also have a clean environment, if we close all of our factories and relocate the factories (and the jobs) to foreign countries.
July 21st, 2009 at 2:06 pm
What would be the difference between the “Recovery Bonds” and any other government bonds?
People with assets including cash do not have very many US dollars in loose cash to invest in these “Recovery Bonds”. They already have their cash in T-Bills and other government bonds. This already represents a lots of money loaned to the US government to cover the various government expenses.
Who will buy these “Recovery Bonds”? The Average US citizen is up to his neck in credit card debt, and should probably file bankruptcy and not have to pay for the good times that he enjoyed and paid for by charging expenses to his card. Most US citizens use their credit cards to enjoy the good life of vacations, new cars, eating out, entertainment, music, booze, cigarettes, concerts, etc.
I guess that the government needs to spend our tax money on wars, military jets with active duty military USAF pilots for the personal use of specially privileged members of congress (Pelosi), employee payrolls, government retirement checks, courts, federal police, failed business bailouts, cash bonuses to the various Wall Street forgers of SEC documents that contributed to political campaigns, Las Vegas corporation junkets for failed corporation employees, foreclosed house mortgages for big spenders with bad credit, new multi-million dollar French manufactured personal corporate jets for political contributor’s bankrupt corporations, pork barrel projects, research contracts, Welfare, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SSI, expensive corporate vacations, new infrastructure, wealth re-distribution, mental health services, imported consumer goods and any other thing that congress and/or the president decides to use taxpayer money to acquire, build or just give to their political contributors and various other privileged individuals with borrowed US dollars.